A document bearing a Presidency letterhead triggered fresh concerns in Abuja. Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu says he was deceived by a man who claimed to lead a government agency that did not exist.
ABUJA, FCT — Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu has disclosed that a man posing as the Director-General of the Policy, Finance, and Investment Promotion Commission (PFIPC) deceived him by presenting documents bearing a Presidency letterhead. Kalu made the disclosure while addressing the controversy surrounding the alleged fictitious agency, according to his remarks made available to the public.
According to the Deputy Speaker, the individual presented official-looking documents that appeared credible because they carried the Presidency’s letterhead. Kalu explained that he initially believed the documents were genuine, adding that the experience exposed weaknesses in the verification process for official communications and appointments.
Kalu said the incident underscored the need for stricter checks before recognising individuals claiming to represent government institutions. He urged public officials and relevant agencies to verify documents and appointments through established government channels before taking action. He also called for measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.
The PFIPC recently became the subject of public attention after questions emerged over its legal status and the identity of individuals claiming to hold senior positions within the organisation. The controversy prompted scrutiny of documents circulated in the name of the agency and renewed discussions about the need to protect government institutions from impersonation and fraudulent representations.
The development means government agencies and public officials may strengthen internal verification procedures for official correspondence and appointments. It also highlights the importance of confirming the authenticity of documents before recognising individuals or organisations claiming to act on behalf of the Federal Government. Relevant authorities are expected to continue reviewing the circumstances surrounding the alleged impersonation and determine any further action in line with the law.
